Our Pictures
| Expert |
|
Survey |
| 18 of 25* | Fairly high rating, good variety of vegetation but little cultural or significance. | -3.5/-5* |
| Expert |
|
Survey |
|
|
Poor, no vegetation, absolutely no maintenance, house is falling apart and thus unsafe. | -3.7/-5 |
| Expert |
|
Survey |
| -20/25 | Poor, some vegetation in background, unkempt garbage, unsafe. | -4/-5 |
| Expert |
|
Survey |
| 22.5/25 | High. There exists a variety of vegetation that is clean and well maintained. | -2.2/-5 |
| Expert |
|
Survey |
| 7.5/25 | Low. The vegetation is nice, but the house is falling apart due to no maintenance. | -3.7/-5 |
| Expert |
|
Survey |
| 12/25 | Moderate. The house is in good shape, surrounded by a nice neighborhood. The vegetation is sparse and repetitive. | -2.7/-5 |
| Expert |
|
Survey |
| 13.5/25 | Moderate. There exists a variety of vegetation, nice amenities, moderately maintained with a sidewalk. | -2.2/-5 |
| Expert |
|
Survey |
| 6.5/25 | Fairly low. There exists very little variation in vegetation. Monotonous neighborhood. | -2.7/-5 |
| Expert |
|
Survey |
| -1/25 | Low. Little variation in vegetation. Few amenities. The arch adds cultural significance. | -3.5/-5 |
| Expert |
|
Survey |
| 14/25 | Fairly high. Nice well maintained vegetation with good variation. A nice place to see the children running around. | -2/-5 |
| Expert |
|
Survey |
| 16/25 | Moderate. Nice vegetation, yet cluttered, not particularly well kept. House is nice, well maintained with a good sidewalk. Seems to be a crowded neighborhood in their backyard. | -2.5/-5 |
| Expert |
|
Survey |
| 18.5/25 | High. House is well maintained in a nice neighborhood. There are some cracks in the sidewalk and surrounding area. Vegetation is well kept, unfortunate stump distracts view. | -2.2/-5 |
| Expert |
|
Survey |
| -1/25 | Low. No vegetation on a busy street. | -2.5/-5 |
| Expert |
|
Survey |
| 12/25 | Moderate. Some vegetation but not much variety. Nice neighborhood, no cultural or historical significance. | -3.5/-5 |
| Expert |
|
Survey |
| 12.5/25 | Moderate. The arch adds cultural/historical significance. Vegetation appears well kept without much variation. Nice adjoining land use. | -2.5/-5 |
| Expert |
|
Survey |
| 16/25 | Fairly high. Well maintained, house is interesting but not a lot of vegetation. | -2.7/-5 |
| Expert |
|
Survey |
| -14/25 | Poor. Unkempt vegetation with few amenities. Vandalized and littered upon. | -3.5/-5 |
| Expert |
|
Survey |
| 11/25 | Mediocre. Lawn is well kept with a few potted plants adding to variety. House is also in good maintenance, except for roof damage. Very boring. | -3.4/-5 |
| Expert |
|
Survey |
| -7/25 | Poor. Lots of water surrounding a jungle of a lawn. The trees, water, and lawn remind one of the marshes in Louisiana. House is well kept, but there are no amenities and the building next to it looks like a business. | -3.3/-5 |
| Expert |
|
Survey |
| -22/25 | Disgusting. Image looks like a burned down store. Side walk is crumbling into oblivion, as the building also disintegrate. Vegetation is present only as sidewalk weeds or neighboring weeds. | -4.2/-5 |
| Expert |
|
Survey |
| 14/25 | Good. Nice well kept lawn with a quaint monoculture surrounding of deciduous trees. Looks like a country club in the back. Space is too open, needing more trees or amenities. | -2.5/-5 |
| Expert |
|
Survey |
| 21/25 | Very high. Nice well kept lawn and vegetation. House is in incredibly good condition with a particularly neat design. Great sidewalk and adjoining land use. | -1.9/-5 |
| Expert |
|
Survey |
| -18/25 | Very poor. Litter surrounds the unkempt grasses and trees. Great variety, but not commonly desired herbaceous plants. | -3.5/-5 |
| Expert |
|
Survey |
| 19/25 | Good. Good sidewalk adds to the amenities, good location of a street lamp. Lawn and house look well maintained, some overgrown bushes... | -2.8/-5 |
| Expert |
|
Survey |
| 13/25 | Good. Lawn and house could use more maintenance. Amenities include a street lamp and well kept sidewalk. Good adjoining land usage. | -3.3/-5 |
| Expert |
|
Survey |
| -10/25 | Very poor. Sidewalk and street appear in good condition. Terrible adjoining land use (large street, what appears to be a railroad track in the back corner, too many power lines). Drive way not maintained, as the house is abandoned. | -4.2/-5 |
| Expert |
|
Survey |
| 23.5/25 | Very high. Large amount of variety of vegetation. Everything seems to fit. Nice well kept playground in a neighborhood. Houses surrounding seem very well kept. | -1.8/-5 |
| Expert |
|
Survey |
| 3.5/25 | Neutral. Good amenities. House under construction. Rubble laying on ground, no lawn directly around the house. | -3.3/-5 |
*The expert surveys are ranked
from -25 to +25. A score of 25 (or near 25) means the picture ranked
extremely well, while scores closer to zero are moderate and those closer
to -25 are terrible. The scale for the surveys is much smaller, from
-1 to -5. A -1 is perfection, while scores closer to -5 are despicable.
|
|
|
|
|
